kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Michael W Thelen <mike@pietdepsi.com> writes:
>
>
>>kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Since the target of svn log is in the public zone, no credentials are
>>>>asked. Later, revision 13 & 14 alter files in the branches/1.0 folder,
>>>>which is private. Since no credentials were asked at first, svn log
>>>>cannot read these specific revisions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I don't quite understand this explanation.
>>>
>>>Whether the target of 'svn log' requires credentials or not shouldn't
>>>matter. The question is whether the *commit* (the one that resulted
>>>in the revisions being displayed) required credentials.
>>>
>>>
>>I believe this is the same issue I posted about in this message:
>>
>>http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-08/0286.shtml
>>
>>... see Ben Collins-Sussman's response to that message for an
>>explanation of what's going on.
>>
>>
>
>Aaaaah, thank you. Yes, now I understand.
>
>So what's the right thing -- send back empty XML elements, or omit
>them entirely, changing the DTD to allow this?
>
>
Omit them, of course. Revprops can have empty values.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 17 23:01:01 2005