[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ISSUE+PATCH: author & date of logentry can be empty in specific situation, problems with log.dtd & javahl

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-08-17 22:57:28 CEST

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>Michael W Thelen <mike@pietdepsi.com> writes:
>
>
>>kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Since the target of svn log is in the public zone, no credentials are
>>>>asked. Later, revision 13 & 14 alter files in the branches/1.0 folder,
>>>>which is private. Since no credentials were asked at first, svn log
>>>>cannot read these specific revisions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I don't quite understand this explanation.
>>>
>>>Whether the target of 'svn log' requires credentials or not shouldn't
>>>matter. The question is whether the *commit* (the one that resulted
>>>in the revisions being displayed) required credentials.
>>>
>>>
>>I believe this is the same issue I posted about in this message:
>>
>>http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-08/0286.shtml
>>
>>... see Ben Collins-Sussman's response to that message for an
>>explanation of what's going on.
>>
>>
>
>Aaaaah, thank you. Yes, now I understand.
>
>So what's the right thing -- send back empty XML elements, or omit
>them entirely, changing the DTD to allow this?
>
>
Omit them, of course. Revprops can have empty values.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 17 23:01:01 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.