Michael W Thelen <mike@pietdepsi.com> writes:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >>Since the target of svn log is in the public zone, no credentials are
> >>asked. Later, revision 13 & 14 alter files in the branches/1.0 folder,
> >>which is private. Since no credentials were asked at first, svn log
> >>cannot read these specific revisions.
> >
> > I don't quite understand this explanation.
> >
> > Whether the target of 'svn log' requires credentials or not shouldn't
> > matter. The question is whether the *commit* (the one that resulted
> > in the revisions being displayed) required credentials.
>
> I believe this is the same issue I posted about in this message:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-08/0286.shtml
>
> ... see Ben Collins-Sussman's response to that message for an
> explanation of what's going on.
Aaaaah, thank you. Yes, now I understand.
So what's the right thing -- send back empty XML elements, or omit
them entirely, changing the DTD to allow this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 17 22:41:56 2005