Re: ISSUE+PATCH: author & date of logentry can be empty in specific situation, problems with log.dtd & javahl

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: 2005-08-26 00:54:43 CEST

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Branko ??ibej wrote:

> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
...
> >So what's the right thing -- send back empty XML elements, or omit
> >them entirely, changing the DTD to allow this?
> >
> >
> Omit them, of course. Revprops can have empty values.

omit them, +1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 26 00:55:16 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] fix non interruptable hang in svn client when connecting"
Previous message: Daniel Rall: "Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u"
In reply to: Branko Čibej: "Re: ISSUE+PATCH: author & date of logentry can be empty in specific situation, problems with log.dtd & javahl"
Next in thread: Peter N. Lundblad: "Re: ISSUE+PATCH: author & date of logentry can be empty in specific situation, problems with log.dtd & javahl"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]