Re: ISSUE+PATCH: author & date of logentry can be empty in specific situation, problems with log.dtd & javahl

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>Since the target of svn log is in the public zone, no credentials are
>>asked. Later, revision 13 & 14 alter files in the branches/1.0 folder,
>>which is private. Since no credentials were asked at first, svn log
>>cannot read these specific revisions.
>
> I don't quite understand this explanation.
>
> Whether the target of 'svn log' requires credentials or not shouldn't
> matter. The question is whether the *commit* (the one that resulted
> in the revisions being displayed) required credentials.

I believe this is the same issue I posted about in this message:

http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-08/0286.shtml

... see Ben Collins-Sussman's response to that message for an
explanation of what's going on.

-- 
Michael W Thelen
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
potatoes.       -- Douglas Adams
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org