Re: svn status enhancement

Scott Palmer wrote:
>
> On 5-Aug-05, at 1:51 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>
>> I'm fairly sure that you and the people who raised issue #1935 ("svn
>> status too verbose with svn:externals definitions") want the same
>> thing, ...
>
> If your example #2 is what is proposed by issue #1935, then yes, I want
> the same thing.

It was my best understanding of what the participants in the issue agreed they
wanted.

>> Do you want that message when the status for that item is non-empty?
>
> I was undecided.
>
>> Do you really want it, or would you be happy either way?
>
> But I think I will be happy either way.
>
>> (3) What do you want? Copy (2) and see if any field that you care
>> strongly about should differ from it. If not, then we're all happy.
>
> We are all happy, or will be when issue #1935 is closed.

Fantastic. I look forward to your patch.

> My primary problem with coming up with a patch is that I am so
> unfamiliar with the code and your style/conventions. I have never used
> the APR lib before, etc.. But I'm making progress quickly.

I hope you'll quickly grow to like it. It opened my eyes to how badly the
software was written in my day job, and how well it could be done. I love it.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 5 20:36:27 2005