Re: svn status enhancement

On 5-Aug-05, at 1:51 PM, Julian Foad wrote:

> I'm fairly sure that you and the people who raised issue #1935
> ("svn status too verbose with svn:externals definitions") want the
> same thing, ...

If your example #2 is what is proposed by issue #1935, then yes, I
want the same thing.

> Do you want that message when the status for that item is non-empty?

I was undecided.

> Do you really want it, or would you be happy either way?

But I think I will be happy either way.

> (3) What do you want? Copy (2) and see if any field that you care
> strongly about should differ from it. If not, then we're all happy.

We are all happy, or will be when issue #1935 is closed.

My primary problem with coming up with a patch is that I am so
unfamiliar with the code and your style/conventions. I have never
used the APR lib before, etc.. But I'm making progress quickly.

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 5 20:19:36 2005