[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "witty subject line about logging feature"

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-07-25 07:06:40 CEST

On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 23:32 +0200, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> What would be wrong with the ra_layer (server-side) sending down a baton
> function that could either write to syslog() (in the case of ra_svn) or
> ap_log_rerror() (in the case of ra_svn/mod_dav_svn).

For starters, we have no server-side ra layer. We have two servers (an
Apache module, mod_dav_svn, and a standalone daemon, svnserve), which
make calls to libsvn_repos and libsvn_fs.

So I don't really understand this proposal, since it refers to a layer
we don't have. It also tries to define a mechanism without first
defining what logging we will be doing, which is exactly the reason why
we needed to back off and start this thread instead of continuing the
old ones.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 25 07:09:46 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.