cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 07/07/2005 04:54:48 PM:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
> > Well, there have been no responses to my post, which was one week ago:
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=102118
> >
> > I think then that we should implement the behavior proposed in that
> > mail, that is, 'svn log -rN foo' should stop behaving as though -rN
> > were a peg revision, and start being consistent with other commands,
> > by treating "-rN" and "@n" in subtly different ways.
>
> +1. Consistency, consistency, consistency.
While I agree with this too, you might want to actively solicit Ben
Reser's opinion. I seem to recall him being pretty strongly against a
similar change that was made in 1.1 under similar circumstances. In the
end, I think the argument that this is really a bug sort of wins out. But
I think he views it as an interface change that should wait for 2.0. I
seem to recall a few people shared his opinion when this came up.
Here is a thread I found from last November.
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-11/0714.shtml
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 8 03:24:08 2005