Charles Bailey <bailey.charles@gmail.com> writes:
> > So, after another too-long hiatus, here's a patch which implements a
> > "common" string escaping function , uses it for UTF-8 escaping, and
> > uses that to sanitize the offending XML, which is then output in the
> > error message that Jack built^W^Wstarted this thread.
>
> I'm new enough that I'm not certain of list etiquette at this point:
> the patch has sat without comment for about two weeks. Does this
> indicate that it should be allowed to expire quietly, saving someone
> the chore of saying, "I wouldn't put this twisted mess into my
> competitor's code, much less my own!"? Should it be dumped into an
> issue that someone might review someday when they've had a free time
> infusion? Should it just bide its time here?
Usually our redoubtable patch manager makes an issue for it, however,
he may have forgotten this time, in which case your reminder is a good
idea...
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 20 21:55:23 2005