Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Include offending XML in "Malformed XML" error message

On 6/6/05, Charles Bailey <bailey.charles@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, after another too-long hiatus, here's a patch which implements a
> "common" string escaping function , uses it for UTF-8 escaping, and
> uses that to sanitize the offending XML, which is then output in the
> error message that Jack built^W^Wstarted this thread.

I'm new enough that I'm not certain of list etiquette at this point:
the patch has sat without comment for about two weeks. Does this
indicate that it should be allowed to expire quietly, saving someone
the chore of saying, "I wouldn't put this twisted mess into my
competitor's code, much less my own!"? Should it be dumped into an
issue that someone might review someday when they've had a free time
infusion? Should it just bide its time here?

No hurry in any event -- I've certainly not had all that much time to
write it, and certainly can't expect someone to have all that much
time to read it. I just want to make sure I shouldn't be doing
something at this point to movit along/out of the way.

-- 
Regards,
Charles Bailey
Lists: bailey _dot_ charles _at_ gmail _dot_ com
Other: bailey _at_ newman _dot_ upenn _dot_ edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org