[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: threads and the working copy

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-06-20 22:22:03 CEST

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:53 -0700, Andy Cutright wrote:
> i'm curious about whether the 1.2 client libraries are thread safe. more
> specifically, is it safe to modify a single working copy concurrently
> using the client libraries? is it supported for example to run two or
> more concurrent commits on different files or hierarchies using the same
> working copy?

It's basically safe as far as I know. If you use ra_dav, neon's
initialization is protected by a static variable, which means there's an
unlikely race condition there.

> along the same lines, i've seen discussion about issues with FSFS and
> the APR on UNIX.

> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
> the bug report says this is "largely fixed". what are the remaining
> issues in 1.2?

If the caller changes the uuid of a repository using svn_fs_set_uuid()
and, without closing that repository, opens it within another thread,
two different mutexes will be used the protect the write lock within the
repository, which means both threads might consider themselves to be
holding the write lock at the same time, which could lead to colliding

The only real-life consumer of svn_fs_set_uuid() is "svnadmin load",
which is not multi-threaded, so this is not a practical issue.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 20 22:23:08 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.