On Saturday 07 May 2005 22:36, Philip Martin wrote:
> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> writes:
> > Or maybe I'm not following your 'non-recursive status' point above; in
> > that case please explain what you mean by that.
>
> As I understand it you propose to avoid storing the revision in a
> directory's entry file if the revision matches that of the parent. To
> get the revision TSVN is going to have to read all the entries files
> up to the root rather than just the the one for the directory in
> question.
If it doesn't update recursively; then you are almost sure to have different
versions in the individual dirs as is; this won't change if only changes to
the parent are recorded, like I proposed. So in practice only one dir up
will be read the first time; and a second time only the current one.
Right?
--
Thomas Zander
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat May 7 23:10:21 2005