Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> writes:
> On Saturday 07 May 2005 22:36, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> writes:
>> > Or maybe I'm not following your 'non-recursive status' point above; in
>> > that case please explain what you mean by that.
>>
>> As I understand it you propose to avoid storing the revision in a
>> directory's entry file if the revision matches that of the parent. To
>> get the revision TSVN is going to have to read all the entries files
>> up to the root rather than just the the one for the directory in
>> question.
>
> If it doesn't update recursively; then you are almost sure to have different
> versions in the individual dirs as is; this won't change if only changes to
> the parent are recorded, like I proposed. So in practice only one dir up
> will be read the first time; and a second time only the current one.
>
> Right?
You seem to be referring to update but I'm worried about status. If
your idea to make update faster causes status to be slower then it's
probably a non-starter.
Also, I find your argument a bit odd: you want to optimise single
revision working copies because you think they are important, but you
seem to be implying that TSVN users won't be using them. If you think
they are important why won't TSVN users think the same?
--
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 8 01:12:51 2005