kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>>kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>>+There is a somewhat looser voting system for areas that are not core
>>>+code, and that may have fewer experts available to review changes (for
>>>+example, tools/, packages/, bindings/, test scripts, etc). A change
>>>in these areas can go in with a +1 from a full committer or a partial
>>>committer for that area, at least one +0 or "concept +1" from any
>>>other committer, and no vetoes. (If a change affects the build
>>>
>>>
>>Does this mean that r14046+r14070+r14301 count as approved for 1.2?
>>How about r14280?
>>
>>I'd love to merge those changes to the release branch...
>>
>>
>
>Well, I meant my commit to be descriptive, not prescriptive. Do *you*
>think those test suite changes should be able to go into the release
>with fewer votes than a core change? :-)
>
>
Yes.
>I haven't looked at them in detail myself. But if you and Fitz have,
>and Max has looked at at least some of them, I'm comfortable with the
>merge. I'd be surprised if anyone were to object. Why don't you try
>it and see? (Then when everyone else comes down on you like some sort
>of Spanish Inquisition, I can just whistle innocently.)
>
>
Fine. I'm tweaking my .procmailrc to forward the hate mail to you.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 7 23:11:31 2005