Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> Is it correct to build the Subversion trunk with version 1.1.x of apr
>> and apr-utils, or should I be using 0.9.x? I built it with 1.1.x and
>> it seems to work fine, but what is the "official" stance? apr 1.1.x
>> breaks binary compatibility with 0.9.x, but does that affect
>> Subversion's binary compatibility policy as well? Even though apr
>> 1.1.x works, I want to build with the version which will be
>> recommended for end users.
>>
>
> We officially recommend apr 0.9x (and httpd-2.0.x), and ship apr 0.9x in
> our release tarballs. That's because we don't want people upgrading and
> breaking binary compatibility. It's also the version we officially test
> against.
In that case, here's a one-line patch to fix a broken URL in the build
script.
-Hyrum
[[[
Fix broken URL in apr-util autoconf macro.
* build/ac-macros/aprutil.m4
Corrected the svn URL for the 0.9.x branch of apr-util
]]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 22 09:21:42 2005