Re: Proposal: Prefer to use preinstalled apr, aprutil, neon, rather than using in source dir ones.

On 31.03.2005, at 14:37, Max Bowsher wrote:

> If there is a system installed version of neon, apr or aprutil, I see
> no reason not to use it by default.
>
> Any objections to me making it so?
>
> Would people like me to add any special options to force the use of
> the included library source even if a system one exists?
>
> Perhaps --with-apr=included or --with-included-apr ?

I think that would be a good decision. I have to manually remove the
included apr and neon directories for the Fink package of svn.

Chris.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 31 16:34:40 2005