On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Barry Scott wrote:
> Patches require log messages, but more importantly, in what situation would
> this new function be worth it compared with calling
> svn_ra_open/svn_ra_get_repos_root directly? (I'm not saying it's not worth
> it, just wanting to be sure it is before promising to create it.)
>
I'm not Berry, but I can understand that someone just wanting
an RA session would be glad to avoid having to mess with RA callbacks and
authentication stuff, when that's already handled by the client APIs. But
instead of new special-case functions, maybe we should export some general
purpose client function to open an RA session, such as
svn_client__ra_session_from_path?
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 31 13:37:47 2005