Re: rationale for 'svnversion' (vs 'svn version') ?

Kevin Puetz wrote:
> I sure hope we have more than 2^16 - the KDE conversion is at r405688, so
> clearly at least some things go well beyond that range...

Oops, sorry, that should have been:

/** A revision number. */
typedef long int svn_revnum_t;

which, being signed, means 2^31...

Duh... where was my brain this morning... ;-)

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org