[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: rationale for 'svnversion' (vs 'svn version') ?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-03-28 19:13:04 CEST

On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 10:04, Scott Palmer wrote:
> If I have a change made that effects two related projects I would want
> to commit the changes in both projects as a single atomic commit (which
> isn't always easy with Subversions UI, but one problem at a time). The
> revision number represents these atomic changes so I would like to make
> sure that builds are done from only one revision of my repository.

So, what's wrong with doing the build after a simple "svn update"?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 28 19:14:23 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.