"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > Right, with (what was actually) my suggestion, passing NULL would not
> > > accomplish either of these things. That's ... the point (that makes
> > > the code behave exactly as it does today). Clkao's code would instead
> > > make his own txn, then pass that (non-NULL) txn to this commit editor.
> > > The commit editor would recognize that it was provided a txn, that it
> > > doesn't "own" that txn, and so would neither create a new txn, nor
> > > destroy the one provided it.
> >
> > Aha! That's much clearer. I like that better than having two
> > get-commit-editor variants.
>
> Good. I'm coding this now.
clkao, see if r13733 meets your needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 29 04:19:13 2005