Re: [PATCH] #2246: repos_get_commit_editor API

On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Right, with (what was actually) my suggestion, passing NULL would not
> accomplish either of these things. That's ... the point (that makes
> the code behave exactly as it does today). Clkao's code would instead
> make his own txn, then pass that (non-NULL) txn to this commit editor.
> The commit editor would recognize that it was provided a txn, that it
> doesn't "own" that txn, and so would neither create a new txn, nor
> destroy the one provided it.

Aha! That's much clearer. I like that better than having two
get-commit-editor variants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 28 20:26:52 2005