[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS as default for svn 1.2?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-03-22 18:17:33 CET

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 08:56, Max Bowsher wrote:
> 24 hours ago, I would have agreed.
>
> However, having stumbled across the problem I filed here:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2253
>
> I wonder if perhaps FSFS isn't sufficiently mature yet.

While this bug and the bug Jani mentioned (assuming it's an actual code
bug) should certainly be fixed, I think they're both essentially
irrelevant to this decision: firstly, becuase BDB's limitations and
foibles bite people way more often than either of these bugs could ever
affect people, and second, because the most important thing about
checksums is detecting corruption (via svnadmin verify) in an existing
repository, not detecting errors in a dumpfile.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 22 18:19:06 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.