[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS as default for svn 1.2?

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2005-03-22 14:56:39 CET

Greg Hudson wrote:
> This has been discussed on IRC from time to time, but I guess not on
> the mailing list. Since we want to branch for 1.2 pretty soon, now is
> the time to decide it.
> Although neither back end is perfect, I think FSFS is less likely to
> bite new users than BDB is. As such, I think it makes a better
> default. It wouldn't have been prudent to make it the default in 1.1
> due to lack of maturity, but I don't think that is a concern any
> longer.
> I guess the right way to decide this is a +/- vote, although people
> should give arguments if they have them. I'm +1, of course.

24 hours ago, I would have agreed.

However, having stumbled across the problem I filed here:

I wonder if perhaps FSFS isn't sufficiently mature yet.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 22 14:58:16 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.