[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: attn fitz: svn_lock_callback usage inconsistency

From: Brian W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-03-16 15:13:30 CET

On Mar 16, 2005, at 7:56 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> On Mar 15, 2005, at 11:05 PM, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was trying to unlock a path in a subdirectory using ra_local, and
>>> it
>>> didn't work. The reason is that ra_local gives the lock callback an
>>> absolute FS path, which it treats as relative to the RA session URL.
>>> I
>>> checked libsvn_ra_svn, and it gives a relative path, which I think
>>> is the
>>> intention.
>>> I think that's a bug in ra_local. I don't know about ra_dav.
>> It was a bug in ra_local... fixed in r13429.
> Does the bug exist in ra_dav or not? Can one you guys test?

I tested it and it does not--sorry I didn't mention it before. The bug
was basically me passing the wrong variable (absolute path instead of
relative path) to the lock_func callback in svn_ra_local__unlock.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 16 15:14:53 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.