Re: ra_svn_check_path() conundrums, need advice.

On Mar 2, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Julian Foad wrote:

> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> Well, I suppose there's always one obvious solution:
>> 1. don't change svn_ra_check_path() at all.
> [...]
>
> That sounds likely to be best, unless more than half of the 17 callers
> would make use of the extra information in which case it might be
> worth changing the exisiting function.
>

None of the 17 callers care about getting the entire dirent_t, other
than svn_client_ls() and svn_client_info(). So I'll go with the
"invent a new RA call" solution.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 3 02:24:55 2005