Re: ra_svn_check_path() conundrums, need advice.

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Well, I suppose there's always one obvious solution:
>
> 1. don't change svn_ra_check_path() at all.
[...]

That sounds likely to be best, unless more than half of the 17 callers would
make use of the extra information in which case it might be worth changing the
exisiting function.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 3 00:06:39 2005