[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Confusing peg revision syntax and default values

From: Josh Pieper <jjp_at_pobox.com>
Date: 2004-12-14 13:12:53 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2004, at 6:40 AM, Josh Pieper wrote:
> > A third option
> >would be to perform no history tracing whatsoever unless a '@'
> >specifier was provided.
> >
> Well, this certainly would fix the complaints about "aah! you changed
> the UI!"
> But would it make history-tracing really hard to use?

Yes of course it would. The second option is a halfway, it makes
tracing slightly easier for diffs/merges and hard for everything else
by only changing semantics for commands that take revision ranges.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 14 13:14:04 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.