Re: Confusing peg revision syntax and default values

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2004, at 6:40 AM, Josh Pieper wrote:
>
> > A third option
> >would be to perform no history tracing whatsoever unless a '@'
> >specifier was provided.
> >
>
> Well, this certainly would fix the complaints about "aah! you changed
> the UI!"
> But would it make history-tracing really hard to use?

Yes of course it would. The second option is a halfway, it makes
tracing slightly easier for diffs/merges and hard for everything else
by only changing semantics for commands that take revision ranges.

-Josh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 14 13:14:04 2004