Re: Confusing peg revision syntax and default values

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-12-12 15:33:43 CET

On Dec 12, 2004, at 6:40 AM, Josh Pieper wrote:

> A third option
> would be to perform no history tracing whatsoever unless a '@'
> specifier was provided.
>

Well, this certainly would fix the complaints about "aah! you changed
the UI!"
But would it make history-tracing really hard to use?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Dec 12 15:37:18 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: [PATCH] Add Commandline Option '--no-diffs-added' to svnlook"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: passwords in subversion"
In reply to: Josh Pieper: "Confusing peg revision syntax and default values"
Next in thread: Josh Pieper: "Re: Confusing peg revision syntax and default values"
Reply: Josh Pieper: "Re: Confusing peg revision syntax and default values"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]