[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Enhancing svn blame (Was: Case study: Mono switches to Subversion)

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-11-20 23:37:50 CET

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, [UTF-8] Branko ─^Libej wrote:

> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >"Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> >
> >
> >Throughout this thread, there has been a fundamental misconception
> >about how to implement blame caches on the server-side. I will now
> >grace you all with a revelation about the One True Way to do it.
> >
> >/me pauses to preen himself
> >
> >Okay, am I annoying enough yet?
> >
> >
> Quite, but I'll note that your proposal has the singular benefit of
> already being implemented. Vdelta is nothing but a set of binary
> difference ranges. :-)
Should I interprete you as saying that svndiff gives us information such
as "this range deleted, this range added, ...". I am surely missing
something obvious, but I don't understand how. svndiff says things like
"take this from the source, then this from another place in the source,
then this new data, etc." I don't see how to translate this into what we
want. Please open my eyes.

Else, I think Karl's proposal is good as far as it goes.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 20 23:28:07 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.