Philip Martin wrote:
>SteveKing <steveking@gmx.ch> writes:
>
>
>
>>Philip Martin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ha! I've had an idea! I suspect that a non-recursive checkout could
>>>well cause nasty things to happen when status tries to handle update
>>>information for paths that don't exist. Does TSVN allow non-recursive
>>>checkouts? They are broken in lots of ways.
>>>
>>>
>>Yes, TSVN does allow non-recursive checkouts. It was requested by some
>>users that TSVN should allow that like the CL client does.
>>
>>
>
>Almost all "svn st -u" calls on a non-recursive checkout generate this
>assert if there are updates for things not in the working copy:
>
>lt-svn: ../svn/subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c:910: tweak_statushash: Assertion `repos_text_status == svn_wc_status_added' failed.
>
>What happens on Windows when Subversion asserts?
>
>
My first guess would be that it triggers a "crash" -- i.e., the kind of
debug report TSVN seems to hook into.
Good catch, Philip!
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 5 01:32:10 2004