[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r11753 - branches/locking/subversion/include

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2004-11-05 00:37:22 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> On Nov 4, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> sussman@tigris.org writes:
>>> * If @a timeout is zero, then create a non-expiring lock. Else, the
>>> * lock will expire in @a timeout seconds after creation.
>> Even if it is -ve?
> Fitz and I looked at "-ve" for a few moments before figuring out your
> shorthand. Is this some sort of puzzle game? :-D

Sorry, I thought +ve/-ve were common abbreviations, but I see they
don't occur in the Subversion code base.

> We should disallow a "negative" value, don't you think? It wouldn't
> make much sense.


Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 5 00:37:37 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.