[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r11491 - in branches/1.1.x: . subversion/libsvn_fs_fs

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-10-21 21:53:53 CEST

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> lundblad@tigris.org writes:
> > Merge r11364, r11410 from trunk to 1.1.x branch.
> >
> > Approved by: +1: bliss, kfogel, ghudson
> >
> > Fix issue 2076 - fsfs does not check if the revision is valid for proplist/
> > propedit/etc
> >
> > Followup to r11364 to fix a problem pointed out by ghudson, namely
> > that an empty file is not a valid revprop file. While changing this,
> > move the creation of the revprop file back up one call level to where
> > the svn:date revprop is set, to make sure that the revprop file for
> > revision zero never exists without svn:date set.
> We generally don't repeat the original log message in the merge
> revision, because that creates data-duplication situation. For
> example, if someone were to propedit the original now, the copy would
> remain unchanged -- oops, nasty divergence! :-)
Looking back at the logs, I see a lot of commit messages in the merge log
message. Did you mean I used too much of the original? A shorter summary
would be enough? A summary is good so you don't have to check the
revisions to get an idea of what the merge was all about.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 21 21:38:28 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.