Re: why arch is 10x better

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-10-10 04:20:25 CEST

Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> writes:

> No, not really. (Well, yes, it is -- but that isn't what this post is
> about :-)
>
> I just thought y'all might enjoy this:
>
> http://www.rblack.org/Subversion.jpg
>
> No, I don't know what it means either.

Rock. I'm telling you, folks. It's *all* about rock.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 10 04:22:31 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wang Jian: "About the subversion/po/*.po and TRANSLATING"
Previous message: Thomas Lord: "why arch is 10x better"
In reply to: Thomas Lord: "why arch is 10x better"
Next in thread: Marc Haisenko: "Re: why arch is 10x better"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]