[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10298 - trunk

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-07-14 22:42:34 CEST

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0500, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
> +Non-stable releases are qualified with "alphaN" or "betaN" suffixes,
> +and release candidates with "-rcN". For example, the prereleases
> +leading to 1.3.7 might look like this:
> +
> + subversion-1.3.7-rc1.tar.gz
> + subversion-1.3.7-rc2.tar.gz
> + subversion-1.3.7-rc3.tar.gz
> subversion-1.3.7.tar.gz

I suspect that we'll never do alpha tarballs for public consumption so
dist.sh doesn't taken an N for alpha. The only reason it's even in
there is I use it for testing dist.sh and don't want anyone to ever
think they're real tarballs.

If people disagree with this it would be trivial to change it.
svn_version.h seem to imply to me that alpha's didn't have an N and for
whatever reason I didn't check to see what this said.

Thoughts?

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 14 22:42:45 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.