[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10298 - trunk

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-07-14 21:39:57 CEST

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0500, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
> > +Non-stable releases are qualified with "alphaN" or "betaN" suffixes,
> > +and release candidates with "-rcN". For example, the prereleases
> > +leading to 1.3.7 might look like this:
> > +
> > + subversion-1.3.7-rc1.tar.gz
> > + subversion-1.3.7-rc2.tar.gz
> > + subversion-1.3.7-rc3.tar.gz
> > subversion-1.3.7.tar.gz
> I suspect that we'll never do alpha tarballs for public consumption so
> dist.sh doesn't taken an N for alpha. The only reason it's even in
> there is I use it for testing dist.sh and don't want anyone to ever
> think they're real tarballs.
> If people disagree with this it would be trivial to change it.
> svn_version.h seem to imply to me that alpha's didn't have an N and for
> whatever reason I didn't check to see what this said.
> Thoughts?

I don't think there needs to be any support for this coded into
dist.sh now. If we ever need it, we can do it then. (The language in
HACKING doesn't have to change either way.)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 14 23:09:29 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.