[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] sprintf elimination, take 2

From: Peter N. Lundblad <lundblad_at_softhome.net>
Date: 2004-05-13 21:15:08 CEST


On Thu, 13 May 2004, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> > > Changing the function signature in svndumpfilter/main.c would be fine.
> > > There is no change in the public API by adding a pool paramater to a
> > private
> > > function. I should have been more exact.
> > >
> > This could be another patch. It has a svn_stringbuf_t argument. Could I
> Given Brane's reaction I'd say there is only a need if too few bytes are

That was what I meant by "could":-)

> allocated... Otherwise it may be a good idea to go back to the i18n work
> (if you don't mind, ofcourse). I got distracted from resolving issue 897

Don't be afraid... I'm I18N:ing as much as I can. I just need something to
do while waiting for patch review. (NOt saying you're slow. We just work
on different times on day and you have other things to do as well:-) I'l
try to get client I18N finished as quickly as possibly, so that we can go
on to other things.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 13 21:05:47 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.