[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Priority, assignment of new "PATCH" issues

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2004-05-12 13:42:28 CEST

Michael W Thelen wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm now caught up on all the old patches that need to be added to the
> issue tracker. The next thing to do is go ahead and add them.
> Sometimes I can get a sense of whether a patch might need to be filed
> with a high or low priority, but I noticed that most previous patches
> were filed as P3. Should I go with P3 as a default?

I think that is a sensible default.

> Also, most of the
> previous "PATCH" issues seem to be assigned to "issues@subversion", so I
> think that's what I'll put in the Assignment field of new ones too.

That is what should be there by default for a new issue - you shouldn't have to change it. It is IssueZilla's way of representing
"unassigned", which is correct for any patch that requires patch-managing.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 12 13:43:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.