[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[PATCH] sprintf elimination

From: Peter N. Lundblad <lundblad_at_softhome.net>
Date: 2004-05-12 14:27:10 CEST

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> > On Tue, 11 May 2004, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> >
> > When doing this, I found some instances of plain sprintf into a
> > stack-allocated fixed-size buffer. Are they worth eliminating as per
> > HACKING? The buffer is 20 chars long, and I think that would be too short
> > if long int happens to be 64 bits on a platform.
> Probably. In case you have to change function signatures to achieve this, I
> don't think it is worth the trouble though. In those cases adding a #
> comment saying that as soon as the signature changes the sprintf has to be
> changed too.
Here we go for more trialia...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Wed May 12 14:17:43 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.