[PATCH] sprintf elimination

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> > On Tue, 11 May 2004, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> >
> > When doing this, I found some instances of plain sprintf into a
> > stack-allocated fixed-size buffer. Are they worth eliminating as per
> > HACKING? The buffer is 20 chars long, and I think that would be too short
> > if long int happens to be 64 bits on a platform.
>
> Probably. In case you have to change function signatures to achieve this, I
> don't think it is worth the trouble though. In those cases adding a #
> comment saying that as soon as the signature changes the sprintf has to be
> changed too.
>
Here we go for more trialia...

//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org