[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Priority, assignment of new "PATCH" issues

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-05-12 19:49:02 CEST

Michael W Thelen <thelenm@cs.utah.edu> writes:
> I'm now caught up on all the old patches that need to be added to the
> issue tracker. The next thing to do is go ahead and add them.
> Sometimes I can get a sense of whether a patch might need to be filed
> with a high or low priority, but I noticed that most previous patches
> were filed as P3. Should I go with P3 as a default? Also, most of the
> previous "PATCH" issues seem to be assigned to "issues@subversion", so I
> think that's what I'll put in the Assignment field of new ones too.
> Please let me know if there are any problems with that, or if you see
> anything else in the patch management process that can be improved.

I think if you have an idea of what the priority should be, go with
that. If you can't decide, then P3 is a good default.

'issues@subversion' is the right default assignee, yes.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 12 21:04:37 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.