Re: [PATCH] SVN_REVFMT_T -> svn_revnum_to_cstring

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 01:50:56PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> It would be a huge change, but if it saves us future trouble, it's
> worth it.
>
> I think it's fine. It's not a portability issue: *we* decide what
> svn_revnum_t is, and if we say it's a long int, then it's a long int.
> And it would be more readable / easier to work with, in the long run.

It'd be nice if xgettext could expand string constants... Because it
would make all this moot. But then I'd guess it'd need to become a C
Pre Processor and we all know that isn't desireable. :)

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org