Josh Pieper <jpieper@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> Since ghudson is getting very close to having a working fs-abstraction
> branch, I am planning on merging the latest FSFS changes into it, and
> moving further development work on FSFS into the branch. I don't
> think either ghudson or I anticipates that there is much work left
> before the entire process complete. Since hopefully the
> fs-abstraction branch won't be very long-lived, having all development
> work on FSFS happen in one place will make merging easier when it
> comes time to integrate this whole shebang into the trunk.
>
> Any objections?
Sounds good. I take it the fs abstraction work needs to happen on a
branch because of broken intermediate states?
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 19:37:21 2004