[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS and the fs-abstraction branch

From: Josh Pieper <jpieper_at_andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 2004-04-27 21:04:16 CEST

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Josh Pieper <jpieper@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> > Since ghudson is getting very close to having a working fs-abstraction
> > branch, I am planning on merging the latest FSFS changes into it, and
> > moving further development work on FSFS into the branch. I don't
> > think either ghudson or I anticipates that there is much work left
> > before the entire process complete. Since hopefully the
> > fs-abstraction branch won't be very long-lived, having all development
> > work on FSFS happen in one place will make merging easier when it
> > comes time to integrate this whole shebang into the trunk.
> >
> > Any objections?
> Sounds good. I take it the fs abstraction work needs to happen on a
> branch because of broken intermediate states?



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 21:04:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.