John Peacock wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>> It seems quite a few patches have come to the list lately, but have
>> not ended up in the tracker via to the usual algorithm (wait for
>> feedback, see if the thread resolves itself first, etc). I'm pretty
>> sure that some of them *should* have ended up in the issue tracker,
>> according to this usual algorithm...
>
>
> As someone who has submitted two or three of those patches, I have the
> additional question of whether I should be attaching them to the
> existing incident or should I be waiting for some more clear guidance.
>
> I think that Garrett was planning on reviewing the patches (when he has
> the chance) but that may not have any bearing about when/who attaches
> the patches to the incidents...
Attaching them to the incident yourself can't hurt IMO, as long as it's
clear that they're work in progress type things.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 18:39:16 2004