Re: RFC: Revision indexes for 1.1

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> Is there a reason not to do non-uniqueness like this:
>
> (PROP-NAME PROP-VALUE) -> (REVNUM1, REVNUM2, REVNUM1 ...)

A couple come to mind quickly:

  - It unnecessarily complexifies the value format, making it into a
    skel, which is a Berkeley-ism (something we would eventually like
    to get away from).
  - Because then each addition is now an edit (which for Berkeley DB
    means we write out more log data than necessary)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 19 19:22:38 2004