Re: RFC: Revision indexes for 1.1

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > Is there a reason not to do non-uniqueness like this:
> >
> > (PROP-NAME PROP-VALUE) -> (REVNUM1, REVNUM2, REVNUM1 ...)
>
> A couple come to mind quickly:
>
> - It unnecessarily complexifies the value format, making it into a
> skel, which is a Berkeley-ism (something we would eventually like
> to get away from).
> - Because then each addition is now an edit (which for Berkeley DB
> means we write out more log data than necessary)

Thanks; both of those make sense. I'll withdraw the question, in the
assumption that Brane would have answered it the same way :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 19 20:37:49 2004