[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Revision indexes for 1.1

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-04-19 19:22:01 CEST

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > Is there a reason not to do non-uniqueness like this:
> >
> A couple come to mind quickly:
> - It unnecessarily complexifies the value format, making it into a
> skel, which is a Berkeley-ism (something we would eventually like
> to get away from).
> - Because then each addition is now an edit (which for Berkeley DB
> means we write out more log data than necessary)

Thanks; both of those make sense. I'll withdraw the question, in the
assumption that Brane would have answered it the same way :-).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 19 20:37:49 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.