[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS abstraction levels

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-04-03 01:53:35 CEST

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:08:03PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> Well, I think it would be much better to have a cover/shim library that a
> SQL backend could use, rather than writing a gazillion db-specific FS
> modules.

That's fine with me if there's one that works well. I can't really
answer this question becuase I haven't really tried to

> But if you were going with a pure Oracle approach, then the best API is
> the 'upi' library. Does Oracle publish that at all? That was what we used
> internally when I worked at Oracle, but I dunno that they ever let
> customers at the thing. Anybody know?

UPI is even lower level than OCI:

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 3 01:54:10 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.