[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS abstraction levels

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2004-04-03 01:08:03 CEST

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:50:15PM +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
> In my too. Of course the first thing to do while programming with
> OCI is to write some normally looking library over it or choose
> one existing.
> AFAIK there are at least two open-source libraries covering OCI
> with more natural API (Ora++ and OTL). In my organization we
> have written our own library so I can't comment on them but this
> could be a way to go.

Well, I think it would be much better to have a cover/shim library that a
SQL backend could use, rather than writing a gazillion db-specific FS

But if you were going with a pure Oracle approach, then the best API is
the 'upi' library. Does Oracle publish that at all? That was what we used
internally when I worked at Oracle, but I dunno that they ever let
customers at the thing. Anybody know?


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 3 01:07:06 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.