[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: proposal: 1.0.1 to follow 1.0.0 fairly quickly

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-02-19 22:32:52 CET

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 10:42:44AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> For me, I think the conservatism should be in the nature of the
> changeset, not in the number of votes needed. That's why I objected to
> adding 'blame -v' to 1.0.1... it's an enhancement, not a bugfix. I'm
> hoping we all agree that 1.0.1 should be about non-risky bugfixes, not
> new features.

I don't think more votes are necessary to maintain a conservative focus.
I think that's being done pretty effectively already. If someone has a
serious problem with something we still have vetos. And even after
something has gone in someone can still veto it. So I'm not concerned.

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 19 22:33:09 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.