Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>> There are a number of bugfixes in the STATUS file for 1.0.1.
>>
>> Meanwhile, it's likely that many of the initial bug reports about
>> 1.0.0 will be answered with "Ah, yes, that'll be fixed in 1.0.1.".
>>
>> So, let's try to release 1.0.1 within about three weeks of 1.0.0. I
>> don't think 1.0.1 needs a four week soak -- one or at most two weeks
>> of '1.0.1-beta1' should be enough.
>>
>> This means merging all approved changes immediately after 1.0.0 is
>> released. We should try to get as many of those changes as possible
>> decided in advance. I don't want to rush any individual change, but
>> once a change _is_ approved, we shouldn't delay its merge.
>
> ...
>
> +1
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 19 18:43:06 2004