Re: process for including changes in 1.0

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:50 PM +0100 Sander Striker
> <striker@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 11:08, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on the STATUS file.
>>
>> +1
>
> As I already said, +1.
>
> So, I count at least 4 +1s for STATUS.
>
> *looks around*
>
> I count at least 2 (Tobias and Erik) for using the issue tracker.

-1 on committing votes into a "STATUS" file in our main source repository. I hate the thought of, between the source changes, a load of commits like this:

  r10000: julianfoad: Voted for issue 9999.
  ...
  r10003: johndoe: Voted for issue 7777.
  ...
  r10009: johndoe: After list discussion, retracted my vote for issue 7777.
  ...
  r10023: julianfoad: Voted for issue 7777 and 7778.
  ...

+0.5 on using a "STATUS" file in another repository. We could still check it out to a convenient place near the root of our Subversion working copy, so that it is easy to access the file and commit and update it.

+0.5 on using the issue tracker. After all, that's what it is designed for, even if its voting system doesn't exactly match what we are proposing.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 19 17:29:30 2003